Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Document JSON output describing library ABI #10201

Closed
cameel opened this issue Nov 4, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Document JSON output describing library ABI #10201

cameel opened this issue Nov 4, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
closed due inactivity The issue/PR was automatically closed due to inactivity. documentation 📖 low impact Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited. medium effort Default level of effort stale The issue/PR was marked as stale because it has been open for too long.

Comments

@cameel
Copy link
Member

cameel commented Nov 4, 2020

Prerequisite for fixing #9278.

The JSON output of solc --abi is documented in Contract ABI Specification > JSON but only for contracts. The information returned for libraries differs but the differences are not documented.
@cameel cameel mentioned this issue Nov 4, 2020
Open
@cameel cameel added medium effort Default level of effort low impact Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited. labels Sep 26, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been marked as stale due to inactivity for the last 90 days.
It will be automatically closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale The issue/PR was marked as stale because it has been open for too long. label Mar 11, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Hi everyone! This issue has been automatically closed due to inactivity.
If you think this issue is still relevant in the latest Solidity version and you have something to contribute, feel free to reopen.
However, unless the issue is a concrete proposal that can be implemented, we recommend starting a language discussion on the forum instead.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the closed due inactivity The issue/PR was automatically closed due to inactivity. label Mar 19, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
closed due inactivity The issue/PR was automatically closed due to inactivity. documentation 📖 low impact Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited. medium effort Default level of effort stale The issue/PR was marked as stale because it has been open for too long.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cameel