-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Branding guidelines -- clarify legal rights around trademark #841
Comments
Here is an example of well thought-out policy for a community project that explains acceptable and unacceptable usage of the brand trademark: Trademark Usage PolicyThe word "Ghost" and the Ghost logo are trademarks owned by The Ghost Foundation. We would like to extend fair usage of our trademarks as widely as possible, so we have created the following guidelines to help people understand what is (and isn't) ok. Permission for UseWritten permission from The Ghost Foundation is required to use the Ghost name or logo as any part of your project or associated assets. Please contact us on info at ghost.org if you would like to enquire about permission for use. The purpose of a trademark is not to prevent anyone else in the world from using it, it is to prevent confusion amongst consumers as to which brand is the "official" one. Our primary criteria for the approval or denial of trademark usage requests is whether or not people might confuse it for an official Ghost Foundation project. Automatic ApprovalIn some special cases, we will grant automatic permission for a project to use the Ghost trademark. Explicit permission to use the trademark is not required when a project meets the following criteria:
Automatic RestrictionIn some specific cases, you will always require explicit permission from The Ghost Foundation in order to use the Ghost trademark. Even if you meet the criteria for automatic approval, you must always seek permission for trademark use if your project meets any of the following criteria:
If you're not sure whether your use qualifies for automatic approval or not, please ask! Applying for PermissionIf you would like to apply for permission to use the Ghost trademark based on the guidelines above, please email us directly on info at ghost.org including your full details and the details of your requested use. Your application's approval will be considered based primarily on whether the product or service in question...
Rules of UsageWith the exception of the "nominative fair use" of the Ghost trademark, your use of the trademark is subject to the following rules (irrespective of whether you received automatic or explicit permission for use):
These trademark rules and guidelines are subject to change at any time. It is your responsibility to check this agreement periodically for changes. |
Current guidelines are here: https://www.ethereum.org/brand
Please specify legal authority or "teeth" which applies to these guidelines as well as specific policies which Ethereum Foundation (EF) recognizes. Answers should be explained clearly on the above page, but we can discuss here before then.
I am working on projects that will bring high-value real-world assets onto the blockchain. We will likely use Ethereum Mainnet -- but our lawyers have many questions. Most of them can be traced back to EF policies regarding usage of the Ethereum trademark.
WHAT IS THE TRADEMARK
WHAT IS THE LEGAL AUTHORITY
WHAT HAPPENS IF THE RELEVANCE OF ETHEREUM FOUNDATION IS THREATENED?
The present unclarity of EF's commitment and policies towards the Ethereum trademark has not caused much trouble for the community yet. EF may behave differently if it is threatened by a replacement.
*This is not a hypothetical question -- I want to know and clarify what is the current policy that EF has.
The future situation that such a policy would apply to is hypothetical, one example is if EF officially supports a fork, let us call it THEDAO2.0. It seems like a great idea and EF updates all software for THEDAO2.0 but actually the market favors not upgrading their clients. However the non-upgrade clients maintain the name Ethereum and the Ethereum logo and the community recognizes this network as the canonical implementation. We want to know what is EF's position should this happen.
SUMMARY
I am working on bringing important real-world assets onto the blockchain, possibly using Ethereum. Think government-recognized ownership of land, government and industry-backed identity verification and high value assets.
There's going to be contracts and real-world trust based on these things.
So the contracts needs to reference something like:
At present many major enterprise/government projects are considering hyperledger because the governance can be more clear.
Questions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: