Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Discussion] - How to make the voting system secure? #2

Open
ppconde opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

[Discussion] - How to make the voting system secure? #2

ppconde opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@ppconde
Copy link
Collaborator

ppconde commented Nov 14, 2022

Possible approach using blockchain:
https://github.com/mehtaAnsh/BlockChainVoting

EDIT:
Interesting reads:
https://web3auth.io/docs/guides/firebase
https://moralis.io/web3-firebase-authentication-create-a-web3-sign-in-with-moralis/

Open to ideas. Leave your suggestions below.

@ppconde ppconde added the question Further information is requested label Nov 14, 2022
@ppconde ppconde changed the title [Discussion] - How to make the system secure? [Discussion] - How to make the voting system secure? Nov 14, 2022
@Web-Project-Administrator
Copy link
Collaborator

I liked very much the system presented on the first link. The fact that the admin can see how many people voted (and who because of the emails) helps the flow of the voting.
Regarding the system security and authentication, there are a lot more things we can do to improve the overall funcionality of the app before going into the security and authentication. My sugestion would be to pick up this issue later when the structure is more developed.
Tell me your thoughts.

@ppconde
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ppconde commented Nov 18, 2022

I agree. Let's keep it simple for now, but it might interesting for later

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants