Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Lösung finden für Rundungsfehler #46

Open
seragarez opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Lösung finden für Rundungsfehler #46

seragarez opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
@erictapen

Comments

@seragarez
Copy link
Collaborator

Beispiel: https://mappingmigration.erictapen.name/CAR/FRA/GFR 2004 und 2015 --> Bei 5 decisions nur 3 Fußstapfen zu sehen. Liegt vermutlich an Rundungsfehlern (die beiden fehlenden Fußstapfen liegen bei < 1).

Mögliche Lösungen:

  • In Einleitung auf Rundungen aufmerksam machen?
  • ... ?
@herbertblb
Copy link
Collaborator

grafik

oben sind 19, unten nur 17 Fußstapfen

@erictapen
Copy link
Owner

Our favourite solution would be to always make the amount of footsteps in the diagram consistent with the sum displayed in the sentence. Same goes for the percentages, that should always amount to 100!

Kerstin tries to find a mathematical solution to that problem, that we round up and down appropriately.

@erictapen erictapen mentioned this issue Feb 22, 2022
Closed
@erictapen erictapen self-assigned this Feb 23, 2022
@erictapen
Copy link
Owner

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13483430/how-to-make-rounded-percentages-add-up-to-100

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@erictapen erictapen

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@erictapen @herbertblb @seragarez