Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EGC <witDetail wit="#A" type="..."/> #312

Open
arlogriffiths opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

EGC <witDetail wit="#A" type="..."/> #312

arlogriffiths opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@arlogriffiths
Copy link
Collaborator

We will need to implement and document some new values of @type on <witDetail>, namely

  • "unmetrical" — display A (unm.)
  • "silemn" — display A (sil. em.)

@michaelnmmeyer : what if a reading is both unmetrical and a silent emendation? Is it possible to allow more than one value on @type? Or to allow more than on @type on <witDetail>?

@arlogriffiths arlogriffiths added the enhancement New feature or request label May 28, 2024
@arlogriffiths
Copy link
Collaborator Author

arlogriffiths commented May 28, 2024

we will also need to allow one of the following two options for representing that a previous edition emended but that our editions rejects the emendation:

  1. <rdg wit="#MSK">vajrasattvety</rdg><witDetail wit="#MSK" type="emn"/>
  2. <rdg wit="#MSK" type="emn>vajrasattvety</rdg>

So far, we have not allowed @type on <rdg>. We should discuss pros and cons of allowing it.

@michaelnmmeyer
Copy link
Member

michaelnmmeyer commented May 28, 2024

I have added "unmetrical", "silemn" and "emn" as allowed values of witDetail/@type in the schema. For the display, it would be too much work to straighten out what we have now, and this is going to be scrapped anyway, so I will just write the new code.

To answer your questions:

what if a reading is both unmetrical and a silent emendation?

It is not possible to use several @type. The way to go, if we follow the TEI documentation, is to use several consecutive witDetail:

<rdg wit="#MSK">vajrasattvety</rdg>
<witDetail wit="#MSK" type="unmetrical"/>
<witDetail wit="#MSK" type="silemn"/>

So far, we have not allowed @type on <rdg>. We should discuss pros and cons of allowing it.

From what I have gathered so far while reading the TEI documentation, your two options are equivalent. The second option (@type on rdg) could be used as shorthand.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants