You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think that epidist_family should pass tests of this form. It currently doesn't.
test_that("the family argument in epidist_family.epidist_latent_individual gives suitable error for non-character input", { # nolint: line_length_linter.
epidist_family(prep_obs, family = 1)
})
I propose to add the following to epidist_formula:
My main point of uncertainity here whether it's worth using rstan::lookup for the price of importing rstan. Or whether we could store the list of valid LPDF functions as data and not need the package. (Then we'd need to rerun to keep it up to date.) This is for quite a small improvement in quality of life for users.
I think that
epidist_family
should pass tests of this form. It currently doesn't.I propose to add the following to
epidist_formula
:I am unsure on 2.
Resources
checkmate
for argument checking #45The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: