Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance of Font Awesome #25

Open
epidrome opened this issue Jun 20, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Performance of Font Awesome #25

epidrome opened this issue Jun 20, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@epidrome
Copy link
Owner

Consider Font Awesome performance.

It seems that the individual SVG version might be more suitable for the typical use case of the theme

This choice might also affect the implementation of the CSS and/or the main layout, which is also open for discussion

@epidrome epidrome added good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jun 20, 2019
@epidrome
Copy link
Owner Author

epidrome commented Sep 1, 2019

The free plan suggests that there is a quota of 10K views/month, which makes the hosting of the free icons a good option if the theme becomes popular and/or if a few users of the theme become popular enough, since the use of the above quota is pooled from a single master.

@epidrome epidrome removed the good first issue Good for newcomers label Sep 1, 2019
@epidrome epidrome mentioned this issue Dec 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant