We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Background
Related to #2721
Based on https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/lifecycle-transition-general-considerations.html#lifecycle-configuration-constraints Starting from September 2024 we can control size of the files which will be moved to archive classes.
Approach
minimum_object_size_for_transit
sls
ObjectSizeGreaterThan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
issue #3753: introduce usage of minimum_object_size_for_transit prope…
5bb799e
…rty from sls cloud region config. Expand exception logging.
915320f
Issue #3753 sls min object size to transit (#3754)
4c537d3
Issue #3753: SLS logs update
c43d314
Issue #3753: add test cases to check that 0 size files aren't taken f…
f1d5fa3
…or transit
Issue #3753 SLS: fix for function prepare_bucket_if_needed - add old …
236afd2
…lifecycle rule to the list of new rules to apply if it matches a new one
No branches or pull requests
Background
Related to #2721
Based on https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/lifecycle-transition-general-considerations.html#lifecycle-configuration-constraints
Starting from September 2024 we can control size of the files which will be moved to archive classes.
Approach
minimum_object_size_for_transit
of cloud regionsls
properties.ObjectSizeGreaterThan
param value for S3 Bucket LifecycleConfigurationObjectSizeGreaterThan
param which effectively leads to effect that files < 128Kb won't be transitionedThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: