Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reintroduce Worker implementation for encointer #91

Open
clangenb opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Reintroduce Worker implementation for encointer #91

clangenb opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@clangenb
Copy link
Member

#89 fixed the worker implementation for recent integritee-workers in general, but the encointer implementation is still not complete and is dangling in a state in between. To make the encointer-worker work, we need:

  • Make some functions needed in sending TrustedGetters and TrustedCalls more generic, such that we can create encointer types instead of integritee types depending on the contexts (currently only integritee types supported).
  • Probably update the type definitions for the encointer types
@clangenb clangenb changed the title Fix Worker implement for encointer Fix Worker implementation for encointer Apr 10, 2024
@clangenb
Copy link
Member Author

clangenb commented Oct 25, 2024

Encointer worker has been completely removed here: #116

@clangenb clangenb changed the title Fix Worker implementation for encointer Reintroduce Worker implementation for encointer Oct 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant