Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for hidden rooms (by link/by invite) #478

Open
jessykate opened this issue Mar 6, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Add support for hidden rooms (by link/by invite) #478

jessykate opened this issue Mar 6, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@jessykate
Copy link
Member

eg. sigil, autumn's house.

@jonathan-s
Copy link
Collaborator

Ie the url would be obfuscated so it won't be as easy to find out about it?

@jessykate
Copy link
Member Author

Yes! Actually there's a couple of different patterns that I'd love to think through. First, worth noting that I think we want the ability to hide at the room level, not just locations writ large. Second, I can imagine uses for both an obfuscated URL approach and whitelist approach.

The use case I have heard most often is folks who have a room they want to make available to an "inner circle" or known set of people, and their fear is usually that a landlord will get wind of it. So in that case the whitelist approach seems most natural.

But in practice the inner circle may not already have an account... so perhaps a bonus feature would be to route an invited email through signup (like we do for bookings) when they are invited to a room.

I suppose we could always start with this and then add the obfuscated url approach after if it seems desirable (a similar thing already exists for inviting third-parties to pay invoices for bookings, which is a feature on the site already).

Thoughts?

@jonathan-s
Copy link
Collaborator

jonathan-s commented Mar 8, 2019 via email

@jessykate
Copy link
Member Author

Yes great summary :).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants