Replies: 6 comments 3 replies
-
Thanks, but something is missing from the test.... Then swap the firmware on the radios to test whether it stays that way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'll summarize what they say. The person who did the test says he will try two more radios tomorrow; a person suggests him to do the test with the same radio (maybe it's you? ;-)) and the author replies that he tested on 3 radios. Perhaps we need to wait for the new tests that he will carry out to be certain (on that frequency). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The experimenter has disappeared, or perhaps he doesn't want to divulge this discovery too much, or perhaps he has received threats ;-), the world of UV-K5 radio users is picturesque, let's not lose heart, one day the truth will emerge. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi all let me get back on this discussion :) From my practical experience, even reversing firmware and radio, I find the IJV firmware slightly better in reception. Ezgumer software, on the other hand, besides the super bandscope that is indispensable, is more'customizable from menu, Backlight is adjustable, and the integration with chirp offers incredible convenience. Lastly, the collaboration of an opensource adds positive grades to the project :) Hope one day to find the final decision getting just one radio with me :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
is there a link for IJV? i could test it out. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
A test; from what I understand, the author made a comparison, on that frequency, between ijv 2.3r5 e 2.4 and egzumer, and the one he receives better is egzumer
https://www.facebook.com/coupe.fiat.9/videos/1079888489850838/?idorvanity=1432752317481975
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions