-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 449
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
broker(emqx) already support QUIC, and i Hope client also supports the Quic protocol #470
Comments
No, there is no plan to support QUIC at the current time. |
hello, I have a fork for testing which is paho C with msquic as QUIC stack (same as in EMQX ) https://github.com/qzhuyan/paho.mqtt.c/releases/tag/v1.3.12%2Bquic1 would be glad to recv some feedbacks. |
Sure. It would be good to start an issue and discussion on the Paho C, because that's where the code would need to go. Once it's in the C library I can look to add anything required to this C++ library (and the Paho Rust library as well). Perhaps send a Pull Request to the C library if you have something working. I assume this should go towards the Paho C v1.4 branch because that is were work is being done for network updates. |
@qzhuyan |
some updates: Now I made a PR to paho C lib but using native openssl QUIC client support in openssl3.4 I am still preparing another PR that is msquic-based, but it is more complex than the above one. |
The inherent disadvantages of TCP are gradually unable to meet the latest needs, especially in the field of LOT. The QUIC protocol based on UDP for transmission is personally considered a good solution
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: