You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
we have a "zoo" of dsls (lets say adsl and bdsl) . and we have a cli do compile files of dslb into a runtime format. these files have also references to "dsla" files. so we call the cli with all files of dsla and dslb.
in the compilation we also want to validate the files of dslb. (semantic validation and all references resolve) but we might want to skip this for the files of "dslb".
what is the best strategy to do this.
here is some things i stumbled on
we can call build twice (once with and once without validaton)
problem is resolving is done anyway. and affected calc would try to reattempt linking of the dsla when building the dslb files
there is a BuildOptions.eagerLinking, can this be used? if yes what would be best way to populate it?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
we have a "zoo" of dsls (lets say adsl and bdsl) . and we have a cli do compile files of dslb into a runtime format. these files have also references to "dsla" files. so we call the cli with all files of dsla and dslb.
in the compilation we also want to validate the files of dslb. (semantic validation and all references resolve) but we might want to skip this for the files of "dslb".
what is the best strategy to do this.
here is some things i stumbled on
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions