Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ER5108 #50

Open
Loungagna opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

ER5108 #50

Loungagna opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Loungagna
Copy link

In Nvim, using :Oatmeal, or trying to activate it via the default om setting, I get the following:

Error executing Lua callback: ...agna/.local/share/nvim/lazy/oatmeal.nvim/lua/oatmeal.lua:15: attempt to call field 'in_visual_mode' (a nil value)

If I'm in Visual Mode, same thing happen.
:checkhealth does not show a conflict on om.

@dustinblackman
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for reporting!

First time I'm seeing that. What version of Neovim are you using?

@Loungagna
Copy link
Author

`NVIM v0.9.5
Build type: RelWithDebInfo
LuaJIT 2.1.1692716794
Compilation: /usr/bin/gcc -O2 -g -Og -g -Wall -Wextra -pedantic -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -std=gnu99 -Wshadow -Wconversion -Wvla -Wdouble-promotion -Wmissing-noreturn -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -Wno-unused-result -Wimplicit-fallthrough -fdiagnostics-color=auto -fstack-protector-strong -DUNIT_TESTING -DINCLUDE_GENERATED_DECLARATIONS -D_GNU_SOURCE -DUSING_UV_SHARED=1 -I/usr/include/luajit-2.1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/luv -I/builddir/build/BUILD/neovim-0.9.5/redhat-linux-build/src/nvim/auto -I/builddir/build/BUILD/neovim-0.9.5/redhat-linux-build/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/neovim-0.9.5/redhat-linux-build/cmake.config -I/builddir/build/BUILD/neovim-0.9.5/src -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include

system vimrc file: "$VIM/sysinit.vim"
fall-back for $VIM: "/usr/share/nvim"`

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants