Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(readme): update README to include the minimum node.js version #726

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 4, 2023

Conversation

lapa182
Copy link
Contributor

@lapa182 lapa182 commented May 4, 2023

On the previous PR, we missed updating the README to reflect the new Node.js engine.

➕ Extra change:
We were rate limited on GitHub API which caused our workflow to fail, this is due to an issue with semantic-release. I've disabled comments on issues to prevent this from happening.

@lapa182 lapa182 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 4, 2023 10:05
@lapa182 lapa182 self-assigned this May 4, 2023
This is a work-around to stop the rate limit issue when publishing. You can check the issue here semantic-release/semantic-release#2204
@lapa182 lapa182 enabled auto-merge (squash) May 4, 2023 10:15
Comment on lines +104 to +110
[
"@semantic-release/github",
{
"successComment": false,
"failTitle": false
}
]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems unrelated – what's the background here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, sorry I should have mentioned this on the description (which I will add). This is because of this: https://github.com/duffelhq/duffel-api-javascript/actions/runs/4881478277/jobs/8710431028

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah thanks for the context. I'm still a bit confused though – the thing you linked to mentions that we've hit a rate limiting issue?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@lapa182 lapa182 May 4, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, indeed. This is because every time we publish a new release we comment on GH issues which causes our workflow to fail if rate limited by GH. Please see semantic-release/semantic-release#2204 for further informations on the work-around and issue

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah I see – thanks! It's a shame we can't add comments to package.json to give more context, but we can always check the git blame for it in the future and find this PR at least

@lapa182 lapa182 merged commit 3bfd235 into main May 4, 2023
@lapa182 lapa182 deleted the update-rocs branch May 4, 2023 10:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants