Blogpost validation

[DavidBruant]

It's been a few days #10 is in queue with no review (we briefly talked about it with @ClementineHahn ).

What about a 2-phase review system ?

1. does the blogpost threaten dtc (image, reputation, financially, values, etc.)? If no, publish
2. send PRs as things go to change/fix the content

[thom4parisot]

I skimmed though it and totally forgot to go back to it later, my bad.

If it's done in 2 phases as described above, it kind of defeats the purpose of the review – which is to add value to what is brought through the writing.

I feel more comfortable with the idea of publishing it together rather than having to fix stuff in the rush because the blog post has been sent off the fence.

That being said, the exact same situation happened when I assembled a few pieces about the website. Some nods were sent but after publication… But again, I don't think the 2-phases review system brings us into doing authoring together. It makes the publishing phase going faster for sure. But are we talking about speed or about collaboration?

[DavidBruant]

was a bad idea