We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thank you for the nice work :)
I was unable to extract the reason why the LPIPS loss is used during training.
It clearly makes sense with regard to the evaluation pipeline (i.e. directly optimize what you are evaluating for).
Could you tell whether LPIPS is necessary? Is it motivated empirically or just used?
Why not use the default loss ( l1-loss + l_ssim) that is used in the 3DGS seminal work?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Thank you for the nice work :)
I was unable to extract the reason why the LPIPS loss is used during training.
It clearly makes sense with regard to the evaluation pipeline (i.e. directly optimize what you are evaluating for).
Could you tell whether LPIPS is necessary? Is it motivated empirically or just used?
Why not use the default loss ( l1-loss + l_ssim) that is used in the 3DGS seminal work?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: