-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"driver failed programming external connectivity on endpoint" (1.7.0-rc1) #3277
Comments
@jamshid |
My mac says
|
same thing happening to me. |
I am getting the same issue when restarting using docker-compose up. In my case it's an nginx proxy service that fails to start. Must be related to the Docker for Mac beta. It started after I installed the beta and hasn't happened after switching back over to Virtualbox. docker-compose version 1.7.0, build 0d7bf73 |
I encouner the same error when I try to start my stack using docker-compose. All the containers start correctly except one (consul). I'm getting this error
I'm sure it has something to do with my docker version beta for mac.
I'm using the last docker beta version for mac ` Server: |
Following the above message, I get |
How does one "release" the port that is in use so that compose can bring up the container again? First time it happened, I waited for a minute or so and it worked on second attempt. Second time, its been about an hour. Docker compose kill, down, rm --all, etc. and something still has a hold of it. |
FYI, tracked in the beta @ https://forums.docker.com/t/port-mappings-are-not-released/10565/11 |
I figure out what the problem is about, the container (consul) causing the issue has this binding port |
Hello, I had the same problem with Docker version 1.11.1 on Mac OSX. |
I too am getting this after upgrading to Docker 1.12-rc2, not sure if this is the right place to post this.
|
Full error:
netstat:
|
I'm seeing this sporadically. Retrying the command after a minute usually "fixes" the problem.
|
I've also been getting the same error as you guys. I believed it was because nginx was binding it ports that were already taken up but I don't think so now. Did anyone find any solutions to this? :) |
+1 Same error on mac |
I had this happening after a move to I had this again today after an update of eg:
|
+1 have the same problem on mac |
@TuningGuide MacBook Pro (15-inch, Late 2011), 2.2 GHz Intel Core i7, 8GB 1333 MHz DDR3
Ran with mounted volume of the ember-cli files using 'ember serve' as the command. |
+1 same problem on the mac with docker for mac |
Please stop sending +1, as it spams all subscriber inboxes. Either use the emoticons (smiley on the right of each comment) or at least give your full setup, version numbers and so on. Thx |
Got next errors:
|
Found solution for people with same error as I shown above. @aanand @dnephin please, add to |
@miraage happy to hear you solved your issue.
@jamshid Why are you specifying an IP for socat (not familiar with it)? How are you using it?
If your goal is for your http_cache to talk to the socat container, why not put them on the same network and be done with it?
|
Well, I'm using docker engine 1.11.2 in centos7 in a Continuous Build/Integration flow to automate tests and as far as I can tell, eventually this error pops up even though no container is running (while re-deploying a specific version of the whole service stack). Also it seems related to the fact that sometimes docker engine gets an error on trying to cleanup after the removal of running containers, and some iptables rules might be kept allocating network ports for some reason, maybe related to moby/moby#23371 (comment) - but I'm still not sure about that. |
…ases Previously we lacked a function to convert from Uwt.error to Unix.error. Happily uwt.0.0.3 contains such a useful error converting function, so we use it. When a port forward is requested, use `Lwt.catch` to handle the exception at the top-level and pretty-print the error message for the expected cases - EADDRINUSE: the port was already 'allocated' - EADDRNOTAVAIL: the interface IP was not found (probably it exists in a VM but not on the host) - EPERM: insufficient privileges to bind a privileged port The pretty-printing is intended to match the output of `docker` on regular Linux. This is related to [docker/compose#3277] Signed-off-by: David Scott <[email protected]>
…ases Previously we lacked a function to convert from Uwt.error to Unix.error. Happily uwt.0.0.3 contains such a useful error converting function, so we use it. When a port forward is requested, use `Lwt.catch` to handle the exception at the top-level and pretty-print the error message for the expected cases - EADDRINUSE: the port was already 'allocated' - EADDRNOTAVAIL: the interface IP was not found (probably it exists in a VM but not on the host) - EPERM: insufficient privileges to bind a privileged port The pretty-printing is intended to match the output of `docker` on regular Linux. This is related to [docker/compose#3277] Signed-off-by: David Scott <[email protected]>
I've had pretty same issue, with Docker for Mac, running postgresql container. So, for me it was caused by postgres running on same port on host system as port specified in my compose config file. Pretty obvious thing, but could be helpful for someone I guess. |
I had a similar problem Docker for Mac running nginx container, my port 80 was being used by apache (native). I used telnet and netstat to see the running service. |
For me it was squid, I stopped squid and didn't see that anymore. So I think it may have to do with whatever is taking up the port and if we force docker to map that port. |
I've encountered same behavior. |
THANK YOU! HOLY FK, I SPENT A WHOLE DAY TRYING TO FIX THIS. |
/etc/init.d/redis-server stop |
Just had encountered the same issue complaining about a Postgres container. Curiously, exiting Docker for Mac (desktop) did not solve the trick, I had to actually select |
just read through this thread, and what seems to be the best answer in 2021 is to restart docker service (sv restart docker, systemctl restart docker, etc ....) |
run;
happened to be kernel networking debugging at the same time - a previous container instance was the culprit
was what gave it away when iptables couldn't DNAT on the |
I got it by doing the command |
same here. Reinstalled PHP on my Ubuntu 20.04 and had a simple test running. Seems like apache runs per default on port 80: # $ sudo netstat -nlp | grep 80
tcp6 0 0 :::80 :::* LISTEN 848/apache2 |
I'm experiencing the same problem with:
I'm unable to restart my services since docker-compose says they are already running, which is true because docker-compose brings those containers up and fails telling they are already up. Restarting the service |
@Daniel-M you could try and find the docker process |
I made 100% sure nothing else was using those ports. The odd thing was the following sequence
As for killing docker I did not tried that, I relied on systemctl, but will try that next time After I restarted my computer today to continue working, docker-compose did not failed (as expected) but I'm not willing to try, have to keep working on things, I wouldn't be surprise it this happen gain, I will provide screnshots or even a video of the console Thank you for your suggestion @mortensassi |
I was having this same issue w/ docker. docker service restarts and OS restarts even would not fix it. I am on Ubuntu 20.04. when running and this warning:
The only way I was able to fix this was by rolling back docker to |
Stop and start the service completely. That’s fixed it for me.
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 21:25, Marcus Tanner ***@***.***> wrote:
I was having this same issue w/ docker. docker service restarts and OS
restarts even would not fix it. I am on Ubuntu 20.04.
when running docker-compose up kept getting this error:
ERROR: for redis_1 Cannot start service redis: driver failed programming
external connectivity on endpoint redis_1
(e55df4eefb70eh58dd408ac3a05385345a2eaa15a19aec555b629b91a77f0aeb): Error
starting userland proxy: listen tcp6 [::]:5055: socket: address family not
supported by protocol
and this warning:
WARNING: Host is already in use by another container
docker-compose version 1.29.0, build 0773730
I tried with docker version 20.10.6 and I also tried 19.03.15 and they
both have the same problem.
The only way I was able to fix this was by rolling back docker to 19.03.9.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3277 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG4L4B4JB5AS7VB72OJR6DTIXT3PANCNFSM4CAF6G7Q>
.
--
Regards,
David Villasmil
email: ***@***.***
phone: +34669448337
|
I had the same problem today on my Ubuntu 20.04. This error just appeared. I think it was because of a recent update.
Additional information:
important note: HOST is already in use. Checking with ps and netstat the corresponding ports are free but on my system I have ipv6 disabled. Looks like Docker is trying to use ipv6 for whatever reason from now on??
|
@dmtanner thank you very much for your comment. After upgrading packages on my system and rebooting I was stuck with docker trying to connect to IPv6 despite being disabled on my system. Downgrading helped, the command is (in case someone is desperate and in a hurry)
EDIT: I did not realize that the issue was opened in 2016... In my case the problem is definitely with IPv6: up to and including version 19 the fact that it is disabled on my system was handled correctly, I upgraded today to 20.something and random issues with containers not starting because of that happened.
|
Ubuntu 20, Docker version 20.10.6, build 370c289 Updated docker and now getting this error, rolled back and resolved the issue. Definitely and issue with the current docker release. Cannot start service postgres: driver failed programming external connectivity on endpoint tradebinder_postgres_1 (8333460cee3dffb87b736b2af62c06ba0ffef7b28ca765ee686a9681d38ef66d): Error starting userland proxy: listen tcp6 [::]:5432: socket: address family not supported by protocol |
MacOS user here. This problem usually happens randomly to me. No processes on the troubled port. Not even a single container, no vbox virtual machine up, nothing. Restarting didn't fix anything. Updating and restarting the Docker service using the Docker Desktop app fixed the issue. Not sure if this will fix the issue in the future. |
Ubuntu 20.04 here, the error message was
To resolve this issue, I used Hope it helps. |
The same error is thrown when the port is occupied, but for users experiencing this issue who have confirmed the port is unoccupied it is more complicated. The underlying issue is due to a breaking change introduced in Docker version 20.10.6 that breaks networking for devices that don't have ipv6 enabled. The only solution is rolling back to 20.10.5 until a fix is published. For additional info see here docker/for-linux#1233 Instructions on how to rollback and blacklist release 20.10.6 docker/for-linux#1233 (comment) |
Unfortunately running into the same issue today, running a Postgres container. Port in use error but the port isn't used, ran all the diagnostic commands I could find to verify this. Restarting the Mac didn't change anything. No way to rollback to the previous version, however, killing docker and restarting it with the following command seems to have fixed the issue:
|
@CodingNagger same for me. I just updated to |
Ran into this issue today. Tried many of the commands above, nothing worked. |
ran this issue today |
I had the same issue which was caused by my local php8 instance (local apache2 server took over the address) |
|
As your error states: something is already running on port 4200. |
Restart Docker completely.
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 at 20:47, Christoph, René Pardon < ***@***.***> wrote:
ERROR: for aa8d9522c8a3_fusion-chain-home-automation_client_1 Cannot start
service client: driver failed programming external connectivity on endpoint
fusion-chain-home-automation_client_1
(4156e28b67d576875589737c68273ab5cb3a1106cce29555cf2596e75386d2ef): Error
starting userland proxy: listen tcp4 0.0.0.0:4200: bind: address already
in use
I can't solve this error. Can anybody help me?
Thanks In Advance
As your error states: something is already running on port 4200.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3277 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG4L4EP4BADRFFW446YKOLVGRHVHANCNFSM4CAF6G7Q>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Regards,
David Villasmil
email: ***@***.***
phone: +34669448337
|
@buckbeak99 If you already restarted the docker service, and this is still popping up, then yes, something else (other than your docker containers) is taking that port number. Sometimes docker ends up in a weird state where the containers are down but the networks are up and you cannot raise your containers because the ports are taken. Restarting the docker service should clear this issue. |
Thank you, @morales2k, and @davidcsi. After restarting my laptop, the error is solved completely. Thanks again for your precious advice. |
I'm pretty sure this was working on docker-compose 1.7.0-rc1 before I installed the latest Docker for Mac beta, which upgraded to docker 1.11.0-rc3. I'm trying to get the socat service to run on port 172.17.0.1:8123, so that it's available to docker builds. My real yml uses an environment variable for the IP address, but it happens even when hardcoded.
verbose.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: