Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IMSLex-Subcat: Convert auxiliaries #146

Open
chmeyer opened this issue Aug 6, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

IMSLex-Subcat: Convert auxiliaries #146

chmeyer opened this issue Aug 6, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@chmeyer
Copy link
Member

chmeyer commented Aug 6, 2015

They are currently missing. I have already prepared some code to extract the auxiliary from the original IMSLex files, but we need to decide how to represent verbs that take both "haben" and "sein". AFAIK, they are specially tagged with "-variant"(?). Currently we do not have an enum value for having both auxiliaries in EAuxiliary. Solutions may be

  • adding a combined value "habenSein" to EAuxiliary or
  • duplicating the subcat frames with differing links to a haben- and sein-LexemeProperty.
@judithek
Copy link
Member

judithek commented Aug 7, 2015

auxiliary and subcat frame together constitute a large part of a verb sense
they may not be separated.

haben-variant should be represented as haben,
sein-variant as sein

the aux. information goes into the LexemeProperty which is linked to Sense

@judithek
Copy link
Member

judithek commented Aug 7, 2015

so it would be your second suggestion, see also the Subcat frame class (-> modeling that subcat frame and aux. belong together):

// LexemeProperty of this SubcategorizationFrame
@VarType(type = EVarType.CHILD)
private LexemeProperty lexemeProperty;

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants