Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Free purchasing not always desired #20

Open
cxkoda opened this issue Jan 3, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Free purchasing not always desired #20

cxkoda opened this issue Jan 3, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@cxkoda
Copy link
Collaborator

cxkoda commented Jan 3, 2022

In many use-cases free of charge minting by the owner might not be desired. Using Seller.so would therefore introduce an unnecessary deployment overhead.

A possible solution would be to split off the free purchase functionality into an own contract - increasing composeability.
The number of sellable pieces will then be configured exclusively via the totalInventory setting. It is now in the responsibility of the consumer to account for possibly reserved pieces in the configurations.

@cxkoda cxkoda added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 3, 2022
@cxkoda cxkoda mentioned this issue Jun 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant