Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version confusion? Ubuntu says 3.6.10, pgloader says 3.6.7-devel #1637

Closed
lifeboy opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed

Version confusion? Ubuntu says 3.6.10, pgloader says 3.6.7-devel #1637

lifeboy opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@lifeboy
Copy link

lifeboy commented Jan 30, 2025

I'm trying to get past the "ERROR mysql: 76 fell through ECASE expression" error. I changed my character-set to utf8mb4 and collation to uft8mb4_900_ai_ci, but I still get the error.

Checking the version of pgloader to see if a newer version is available:

# apt install pgloader
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
pgloader is already the newest version (3.6.10-1build2).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 76 not upgraded.

root@numbe-imb-accounting:/home/postgres# pgloader -V
pgloader version "3.6.7~devel"
compiled with SBCL 2.2.9.debian

root@numbe-imb-accounting:/home/postgres# dpkg -l pgloader
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version        Architecture Description
+++-==============-==============-============-================================================
ii  pgloader       3.6.10-1build2 amd64        extract, transform and load data into PostgreSQL

So which is it?

@lifeboy
Copy link
Author

lifeboy commented Jan 30, 2025

I just compiled the latest release and it's the same out of sync version numbers.

git clone https://github.com/dimitri/pgloader.git
pgloader/build/bin# ./pgloader -V
pgloader version "3.6.70f3557"
compiled with SBCL 2.2.9.debian

@lifeboy
Copy link
Author

lifeboy commented Feb 3, 2025

Problem was solved with the compiled version, which is strange, but also has been reported elsewhere. Why make a binary available when it doesn't include whatever the compiled version has?

@lifeboy lifeboy closed this as completed Feb 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant