Skip to content

USE CASES - get mud #183

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
yucongalicechen opened this issue May 5, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

USE CASES - get mud #183

yucongalicechen opened this issue May 5, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@yucongalicechen
Copy link
Collaborator

          OK, this is great now we have the UCs.  I think we are doing UC1 and UC3 and UC4.

UC1 is composition+energy+rho -> diameter
UC3 is comp + E -> mu (fully dense and 50% packing fraction)

I think that we probably want:
F1: comp + E + density -> mu
F2: comp + E -> estimated mu after looking up a CIF

Then we can satisfy
UC1 as muD/F1(comp,E,density)
UC4 as muD/F2(comp,E)
F2 satisfies UC3

Please could you close this and make one PR for each of those functions?

Do we also need a command line app that the user runs to get this info? Let's put that on a separate PR, with the docs too.

It is already 3:20 so I guess we won't get this merged by 5. Shall we push off that meeting until tomorrow?

Originally posted by @sbillinge in #175 (review)

@sbillinge
Copy link
Contributor

I am not sure what this issue is? Is it just to capture the UCs? In that case give it a title something like USE CASES - get mud. Then we know it is not a task that needs to be completed but kind of a documentation record.

@yucongalicechen yucongalicechen changed the title feat: CLI app for getmuD USE CASES - get mud May 6, 2025
@yucongalicechen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I am not sure what this issue is? Is it just to capture the UCs? In that case give it a title something like USE CASES - get mud. Then we know it is not a task that needs to be completed but kind of a documentation record.

^edited.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants