We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
See #1441, #1442.
Idea is that since the CQF stores hashes, we would be able to retrieve hashes and then reverse them to get the k-mers (at least for k <= 32).
@betatim suggests keywords "avalanching" ("“small change makes big change in the hash value”) and maybe symmetric ciphers
@ctb looking at bit relocation and this link and this link.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
also see https://gist.github.com/betatim/1d4ee182a62d00afb93b8f239285b735
Sorry, something went wrong.
Heng Li to the rescue: https://gist.github.com/lh3/59882d6b96166dfc3d8d
You thinking https://gist.github.com/lh3/59882d6b96166dfc3d8d#64-bit-mix-functions ?
No branches or pull requests
See #1441, #1442.
Idea is that since the CQF stores hashes, we would be able to retrieve hashes and then reverse them to get the k-mers (at least for k <= 32).
@betatim suggests keywords "avalanching" ("“small change makes big change in the hash value”) and maybe symmetric ciphers
@ctb looking at bit relocation and this link and this link.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: