Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QUESTION: Possibility to add body file path instead #136

Open
5 tasks
mperello-tech opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
5 tasks

QUESTION: Possibility to add body file path instead #136

mperello-tech opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@mperello-tech
Copy link

馃摑 Hello, just wondering if anyone here had the need to attach a body file instead of list of commits as described in the readme. Is there a way to pass in the file location for the body?

Thanks a lot!

鈿狅笍 Checklist

  • Provided a clear and concise description of what the issue is.
  • Given a clear and concise description of what is expected.
  • Proposed a clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or other features.
  • Added any other context or screenshots about the feature request.
  • Associated pull request has been already created and link was provided.

Check CONTRIBUTING.md and CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md for more information

ChristophShyper added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2023
Allows to use a custom file as PR body
Addresses #136
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this issue Nov 3, 2023
2 tasks
ChristophShyper added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2023
Allows to use a custom file as PR body
Addresses #136
@ChristophShyper
Copy link
Member

Hello @mperello-tech !
I was thinking about it and don't quite understand the difference it would do between just using template variable.
Gave it a try, but I don't think it will give anything new to the table.
Can you elaborate more on what you want to achieve?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants