-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add bioregistry as IRI candidate discovery source #23
Comments
Hi @JJ-Author, I am one of the maintainers of the Bioregistry. I am happy to answer any questions you have about it, discuss potential new features, content, exports, etc. |
Hey, @cthoyt thanks for your message. Indeed i found that you also provide RDF here https://bioregistry.io/download |
Yes, it's the case that the RDF dump is generated on the nightly build and isn't part of the live website. You can expect that it's up-to-date though, since everything is automated! Direct download link: |
Is this thread still active? |
Hey @RiddhiMenroy, with the issues tagged as "enhancements" we keep record of our wishlist. We might tackle these once we have free resources or a student that is interested in doing it. |
hi @JJ-Author and @RiddhiMenroy, is there anything I can do from the Bioregistry side to help this out? |
Nothing yet, thanks!
…On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 04:51, Charles Tapley Hoyt ***@***.***> wrote:
hi @JJ-Author <https://github.com/JJ-Author> and @RiddhiMenroy
<https://github.com/RiddhiMenroy>, is there anything I can do from the
Bioregistry side to help this out?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#23 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A2HCURXMNFAXHY6BWUXUWQLW4ON7XANCNFSM6AAAAAAR7ULOB4>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Bioregistry is now part of the discovery process. I used the registry available at https://bioregistry.io/api/registry?format=json, and the |
Many of the resources in the Bioregistry neither have an RDF nor OWL artifact associated with them, so this isn't a surprise. If I had to guess, maybe <5% of the resources for which an RDF or OWL actually exists do not have it already annotated in the Bioregistry (i.e., low false negative rate) FYI, some of them might have |
Ok, but the parsing of obo files (and generally more supported formats) is an issue of its own. I'll close this one in favor of this one |
see e.g. https://bioregistry.io/registry/ero
offer json output including download links and uri scheme as starting point for Archivo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: