From 34f09085790f9e5f4b29a560dffa5517df170369 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Budzynski Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:56:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] update list and links --- _drafts/why-r-is-a-trash-language.md | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/_drafts/why-r-is-a-trash-language.md b/_drafts/why-r-is-a-trash-language.md index 84723bb..cacc5cb 100644 --- a/_drafts/why-r-is-a-trash-language.md +++ b/_drafts/why-r-is-a-trash-language.md @@ -221,14 +221,14 @@ Twitter that made fun of these features. - Other than individual voices stating that their packages suck there appears to be zero resistance against them (because basic user of R doesn't even understand what dependencies are) -6. It gives the academia ivory tower vibes (bunch of academics developing the +4. It gives the academia ivory tower vibes (bunch of academics developing the core language, not interacting with outside users, users mainly also in academia, not interested in contributing, students forced to use the language also not inclined to get involved in helping developing the language). -7. Hard to find any help because packages contain stupid puns containing the +5. Hard to find any help because packages contain stupid puns containing the letter R and the one letter name doesn't seem to help with searching for help on google. -8. The language lack many basic tools like good code formatting, linting, etc. +6. The language lack many basic tools like good code formatting, linting, etc. ### Outdated packaging system @@ -255,3 +255,5 @@ Python and C++ [7]: https://rdatatable.gitlab.io/data.table/ [8]: https://polars.rs/ [9]: https://mc-stan.org/rstan/ +[10]: https://twitter.com/WhyDoesR +[11]:https://stackoverflow.com/q/63606106/13158146