From 22c1e1c526db46c4a784fdbe520a2bff33c86b2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Budzynski Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 10:49:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] add missing point --- _drafts/why-r-is-a-trash-language.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_drafts/why-r-is-a-trash-language.md b/_drafts/why-r-is-a-trash-language.md index c2b9e8b..079b495 100644 --- a/_drafts/why-r-is-a-trash-language.md +++ b/_drafts/why-r-is-a-trash-language.md @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ up and surpassed it with the `polars` package. ## What makes it diffiult to use R -### For Statisticians by Statisticians +### For Statisticians by Statisticians (this needs to broken into smaller points as there is a lot to unpack) 1. There are many bizzare language design decisions, like inconsistent fucntion names. @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ up and surpassed it with the `polars` package. 7. Hard to find any help because packages contain stupid puns containing the letter R and the one letter name doesn't seem to help with searching for help on google. +8. The language lack many basic tools like good code formatting, linting, etc. ### Outdated packaging system