---
bibtex: @article{møller2008,
title={A critical note on ‘the rise of illiberal democracy’},
author={M⊘ller, J⊘rgen},
journal={Australian Journal of Political Science},
volume={43},
number={3},
pages={555--561},
year={2008},
publisher={Taylor \& Francis}
}
---
Zakaria argues that "Democracy is flourishing; constitutional liberalism is not" and later "Far from being a temporary or transitional stage, it appears that many countries are settling onto a form of government that mixes a substantial degree of democracy with a substantial degree of illiberalism"
Zakaria does this by combining Freedom House's Survey data on political rights and civil liberties into a single metric. But a single dimension cannot capture the full topography of a two axis conception.
Møller then re-analyses the Freedom House data using a Political Rights v Civil Liberties topography.
During the period 1990 to 2005, the percentage of states that were liberal democracies grew from 30% to 41%.
Illiberal democracies (numbering only 7-26 states) fluctuated between 33% and 8% of all democracies, with a gradual downward trend after 2000.
"The bivariate correlation between ‘political rights’ and ‘civil liberties’ in 2005 finds expression in a Pearson’s r of no less than 0.951." p560
Illiberal non-democracies remained steady at 53-59% of all states.