Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'Bad' #37

Open
AH34311 opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'Bad' #37

AH34311 opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@AH34311
Copy link

AH34311 commented Jan 3, 2018

Hi

When running the latest version of this script 2,2rc4 with a simple "./check_idrac -H x.x.x.x -v2c -c public" the output looks good until the end where it displays the following error at the command line:
PS
--PS 1: OK, Volt I/O: 264 V/(N/A) V, Current: 0.1 A, Watt I/O: 1260.0 W/1100 W
--PS 2: OK, Volt I/O: 264 V/(N/A) V, Current: 0.0 A, Watt I/O: 1260.0 W/1100 W
DISK
--PDisk 1 (0:1:0) 1117.25 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [HGST, HDD, S/N: 0EGV1HGF]
--PDisk 2 (0:1:1) 1117.25 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [HGST, HDD, S/N: 0EGV79GF]
--PDisk 3 (0:1:2) 1117.25 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [HGST, HDD, S/N: 0EGV6BXF]
--PDisk 4 (0:1:3) 1117.25 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [HGST, HDD, S/N: 0EGV4X7F]
FAN
--System Board Fan1: 1440 RPM - ENABLED/OK
BATTERY
--System Board CMOS Battery: ENABLED/OK [PRESENCEDETECTED]
--PERC ROMB Battery: ENABLED/OK [PRESENCEDETECTED]
PU
--PU 1: ENABLED/OK, RedundancyStatus: FULL, SystemBoard Pwr Consumption: 84 W
MEM
--Memory 1 (DIMM Socket A1) 8.0 GB/2400 MHz: ENABLED/OK [26, Micron Technology, S/N: 12E5CCF2]
--Memory 2 (DIMM Socket A2) 8.0 GB/2400 MHz: ENABLED/OK [26, Micron Technology, S/N: 12E5CEB0]
--Memory 3 (DIMM Socket A3) 8.0 GB/2400 MHz: ENABLED/OK [26, Micron Technology, S/N: 12E5CE55]
--Memory 4 (DIMM Socket A4) 8.0 GB/2400 MHz: ENABLED/OK [26, Micron Technology, S/N: 12E5CCBA]
VDISK
--VDisk 1 (DATA): OK/ONLINE, RAID-10 (2234.5 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 0 on RAID Controller in Slot 3]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./check_idrac", line 847, in
result, tmp_code = PARSER().main()
File "./check_idrac", line 643, in main
hw_dict = self.classifier(snmp_data, hw_dict) # classify data
File "./check_idrac", line 412, in classifier
item_order = int(_.split()[0].split('.')[-1])
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'Bad'

I believe as a result when this is implemented within Nagios I get a Status of WARNING. Individually when all items are checked rather than all at once - the output is OK.
@dangmocrang
Copy link
Owner

ah... maybe something wrong in global call...

@asdorsey
Copy link

asdorsey commented Apr 26, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Also seeing this issue:

# python idrac_2.2rc4 -H 10.181.4.13 -v 2c -c public
PS
--
DISK
--PDisk 1 (0:1:0) 3725.5 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [ATA, HDD, S/N: Z1Z54QGG] isFailing: 0
--PDisk 2 (0:1:1) 3725.5 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [ATA, HDD, S/N: Z1Z550ZP] isFailing: 0
--PDisk 3 (0:1:2) 3725.5 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [ATA, HDD, S/N: Z1Z54PW8] isFailing: 0
--PDisk 4 (0:1:3) 3725.5 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [ATA, HDD, S/N: Z1Z54HCY] isFailing: 0
--PDisk 5 (0:1:4) 3725.5 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [ATA, HDD, S/N: Z1Z550PM] isFailing: 0
--PDisk 6 (0:1:5) 3725.5 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [ATA, HDD, S/N: Z1Z54P2T] isFailing: 0
--PDisk 7 (0:1:6) 3725.5 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [ATA, HDD, S/N: 67NEKEHLFVLC] isFailing: 0
--PDisk 8 (0:1:7) 3725.5 GB: ONLINE, PowerStat: SPUNUP, HotSpare: no [ATA, HDD, S/N: Z1Z5510K] isFailing: 0
FAN
--
BATTERY
--System Board CMOS Battery: ENABLED/OK [PRESENCEDETECTED]
--PERC1 ROMB Battery: ENABLED/OK [PRESENCEDETECTED]
--PERC2 ROMB Battery: ENABLED/OK [0]
PU
--
MEM
--
VDISK
--VDisk 1 (Virtual Disk 0): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 0 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 2 (Virtual Disk 1): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 1 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 3 (Virtual Disk 2): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 2 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 4 (Virtual Disk 3): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 3 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 5 (Virtual Disk 4): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 4 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 6 (Virtual Disk 5): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 5 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 7 (Virtual Disk 6): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 6 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 8 (Virtual Disk 7): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 7 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 9 (Virtual Disk 8): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 8 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 10 (Virtual Disk 9): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 9 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 11 (Virtual Disk 10): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 10 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 12 (Virtual Disk 11): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 11 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 13 (Virtual Disk 12): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 12 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 14 (Virtual Disk 13): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (1843.2 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 13 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
--VDisk 15 (Virtual Disk 14): OK/ONLINE, RAID-5 (273.71 GB), BadBlock: 0 [Virtual Disk 14 on Integrated RAID Controller 1]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "idrac_2.2rc4", line 848, in <module>
    result, tmp_code = PARSER().main()
  File "idrac_2.2rc4", line 644, in main
    hw_dict = self.classifier(snmp_data, hw_dict)  # classify data
  File "idrac_2.2rc4", line 413, in classifier
    item_order = int(_.split()[0].split('.')[-1])
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'MIB-Dell-10892::systemStateGlobalSystemStatus'

Edit: There was a debug statement directly before the part of the script where the error occurred. I uncommented it, and got some good information:

# python idrac_2.2rc4 -H 10.181.4.13 -v 2c -c public
...
matched: MIB-Dell-10892::systemStateGlobalSystemStatus No Such Object available on this agent at this OID
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "idrac_2.2rc4", line 848, in <module>
    result, tmp_code = PARSER().main()
  File "idrac_2.2rc4", line 644, in main
    hw_dict = self.classifier(snmp_data, hw_dict)  # classify data
  File "idrac_2.2rc4", line 413, in classifier
    item_order = int(_.split()[0].split('.')[-1])
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'MIB-Dell-10892::systemStateGlobalSystemStatus'

It looks like this may be an issue with the MIB. I will investigate more.

@asdorsey
Copy link

I managed to work around the issue. The following patch resolves the problem:

--- idrac_2.2rc4        2018-04-23 09:06:36.000000000 +0000
+++ idrac_2.2rc4.new    2018-04-26 16:35:02.758174688 +0000
@@ -410,8 +410,11 @@
         for _ in data:
             if item.search(_):
                 #--debug print 'matched:', _
-                item_order = int(_.split()[0].split('.')[-1])
-                item_info = ' '.join(_.split()[1:])
+                try:
+                    item_order = int(_.split()[0].split('.')[-1])
+                    item_info = ' '.join(_.split()[1:])
+                except ValueError:
+                    continue
                 if self.hardware[2] == 'PS':
                     if 'voltageProbeReading' in _:
                         item_order -= 25  # ps volt starting with number 26

I don't know if this breaks anything else in the script, but it stopped giving that error at the end.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@asdorsey @dangmocrang @AH34311