Skip to content

The training quality of Instruct-GS2GS is inferior to Instruct-Nrf2nerf #20

@cici19850

Description

@cici19850

Train using Instruct-GS2GS as follows:
First, execute the command: ns-train splatfacto --data data\farm-small --max-num-iterations 20000
Next, execute the command: ns-train igs2gs --data data\farm-small --load-dir outputs/farm-small/splatfacto/2024-10-24_180131/nerfstudio_models --pipeline.prompt "make it look like it just snowed" --pipeline.guidance-scale 12.5 --pipeline.image-guidance-scale 1.5 (Default training 7500 times)
The final effect is as follows:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/073f51c0-2534-4ed8-9e27-5caea571f0e2
1731577929399

Train using Instruct-Nrf2nerf as follows:
First, execute the command: ns-train nerfacto --data data\farm-small (Default training 30000 times)
Next, execute the command: ns-train in2n --data data\farm-small --load-dir outputs\farm-small\nerfacto\2024-11-14_115128\nerfstudio_models --pipeline.prompt "make it look like it just snowed" --pipeline.guidance-scale 7.5 --pipeline.image-guidance-scale 1.5 (Default training 15000 times)
The final effect is as follows:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6ef1a59a-70b1-4b97-b690-d010822ec2ba
1731577949615

What is the reason why Instruct-GS2GS is less effective than Instruct-Nrf2nerf? Is there any way to solve it

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions