let is included in item scope

[AndreasArvidsson]

let foo, bar
"take item fine"

Current behavior: let foo
Desired behavior: foo

[pokey]

I think we probably want to solve this one using #1047 so that we don't run into issues with [foo, bar], [baz, bongo] = ... skipping the smaller iteration scopes, right?

[AndreasArvidsson]

Correct