Replies: 3 comments
-
Works for me |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Sounds good to me, too! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Also, given that in the future these will become standalone modifiers, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As part of implementing #324, we'll be formalizing identifiers to indicate whether to include delimiters, exclude delimiters, or select delimiters themselves. Currently the terms are
excludeDelimiters
,includeDelimiters
, anddelimitersOnly
. However, we'd like to use this same machinery to allow things like unwrapping / rewrappingif
statements, so I'm not sure "delimiters" is the term we want to use to refer to the guard of anif
statement. What about the following rename:includeDelimiters
=>fullScope
,excludeDelimiters
=>interiorOnly
, anddelimitersOnly
=>excludeInterior
?I believe that these terms work for both delimiter pairs, as well as things like strings and
if
statements.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions