Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

produced JSON files should have the .json extension as suggested by RFC 8259 #141

Open
lzaoral opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

produced JSON files should have the .json extension as suggested by RFC 8259 #141

lzaoral opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@lzaoral
Copy link
Member

lzaoral commented Nov 22, 2023

We should probably change the extension from .js to .json as recommended by the RFC defining JSON: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8259#section-11

Originally reported in openscanhub/openscanhub#186 (comment).
@lzaoral lzaoral mentioned this issue Nov 22, 2023
Closed
@kdudka
Copy link
Member

kdudka commented Nov 22, 2023

One way to do this in a backward-compatible way would be to provide symlinks with the .js suffix like we did in #124.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kdudka @lzaoral