You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 2, 2024. It is now read-only.
However, this definition is not yet part of the standard, and even less supported by the STAC tools/APIs/ecosystem. radiantearth/stac-spec#1254
In the meantime, and to allow catalogs that want to remain in 1.0 version, the extension should also as alternative either the eo:bands or raster:bands. The pystac implementation could support all of them transparently. Probably raster:bands would be better than eo:bands, as it shares more required properties (dtype, nodata, etc.) that are needed by MLM.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The MLM definition relies on STAC 1.1 Bands.
https://github.com/rbavery/dlm-extension/tree/validate?tab=readme-ov-file#bands-and-statistics
However, this definition is not yet part of the standard, and even less supported by the STAC tools/APIs/ecosystem.
radiantearth/stac-spec#1254
In the meantime, and to allow catalogs that want to remain in 1.0 version, the extension should also as alternative either the
eo:bands
orraster:bands
. Thepystac
implementation could support all of them transparently. Probablyraster:bands
would be better thaneo:bands
, as it shares more required properties (dtype
,nodata
, etc.) that are needed by MLM.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: