Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EPIC] Improve relayer API #200

Open
gjermundgaraba opened this issue Jan 5, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

[EPIC] Improve relayer API #200

gjermundgaraba opened this issue Jan 5, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
epic Large body of work towards a product feature needs discussion This issue needs more discussion before its implementation relayer Issues related to the relayer

Comments

@gjermundgaraba
Copy link
Contributor

As was discussed a while back, we need to improve the API surface to make using the relayer easier and more straightforward.

This issue needs discussion and input from users before we can start on it.

@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba added the needs discussion This issue needs more discussion before its implementation label Jan 5, 2025
@srdtrk srdtrk added the relayer Issues related to the relayer label Jan 10, 2025
@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba changed the title Improve API surface UX Improve relayer API surface UX Jan 16, 2025
@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba changed the title Improve relayer API surface UX EPIC: Improve relayer API surface UX Jan 17, 2025
@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba added the epic Large body of work towards a product feature label Jan 17, 2025
@srdtrk srdtrk changed the title EPIC: Improve relayer API surface UX EPIC: Improve relayer API Jan 21, 2025
@srdtrk srdtrk changed the title EPIC: Improve relayer API [EPIC] Improve relayer API Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
epic Large body of work towards a product feature needs discussion This issue needs more discussion before its implementation relayer Issues related to the relayer
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants