boost: use cppstd_flag(), clean up cppstd handling, use can_run()
#25963
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Mostly superseded by #26030. @uilianries, maybe you can incorporate the can_run() improvements as well. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Changes to recipe: boost/[*]
Motivation
Fixes conan-io/conan#17322, which fails due to C++26 not yet being supported in the recipe.
Gets rid of about 250 lines of logic that was there solely to work around potentially missing
compiler.cppstdinfo.Details
Also replaces
cross_building()used to disable running of test executables.not can_run()is a more appropriate check there.cppstd_flag()is available since Conan 2.2.0, so I adjustedrequired_conan_versionaccordingly.I'm aware of the request to leave Conan v1 legacy cleanup to the team, but this also fixes a functional issue in the recipe and seemed appropriate. Feel free to close this one if you disagree. I don't intend to open any additional ones.