-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MSFragger search result visualization #535
Comments
Hi Baopu, I'm afraid that pep.xml is not as standardized as one may think. We therefore have to implement individual support for the different search engines producing pep.xml files, for example to correctly parse the scores. As far as I remember, this is not something we have yet done for MSFragger. However, if you are able to share an example of the MSFragger data you are trying to load in PeptideShaker we can try to have a closer look at see whether it is something we can consider implementing. Best regards, |
Dear peptide-shaker team, Thank you very much! I'm sorry I don't know much about peptideshaker, but I'm amazed by the software's ability to parse search results. Thank you very much for your willingness to try to help solve my problem, and the following is my search results, its corresponding literature is "Enhancing Cysteine Chemoproteomic Coverage through Systematic Assessment of Click Chemistry Product Fragmentation". Looking forward to your reply~ Best wishes, |
Hi Baopu, I had a look at the files you shared plus the additional data from PRIDE. Adding support for loading MSFragger pep.xml files should not be too difficult, however there is an issue with the decoy annotation in the FASTA file used as it is not of the format that we support and I'm not sure how easy this would be to fix. Furthermore, it is worth noting that PeptideShaker is not strictly a tool for visualizing search results but it also reprocesses and analyzes them. Hence, the results displayed in PeptideShaker will not be identical to the results in the original paper. With this in mind, you may therefore instead consider to reprocess the raw data from the paper via SearchGUI and then load those results in PeptideShaker. But this of course all depends on what you are trying to achieve my utilizing the given dataset. Best regards, |
Dear peptide-shaker team, Thank you very much for your reply and reminder. I did mistake PeptideShaker for a pure tool for visualizing and analyzing search results. However, this time I want to use the newly developed Labile PTM mode search mode of MSFragger. SearchGUI may not support this new type of search mode. But thank you very much for your help. If you are willing to introduce this new type of search mode to SearchGUI, I will be the first to try it out. Thank you! Best wishes, |
Hi Baopu, I'm afraid that we do not currently have the resources to implement this type of PTM search in our tools. I will however keep the issue open in case the situation changes in the future. Best regards, |
Dear peptide-shaker team, Thank you, I will continue to follow the latest developments of SearchGUI and PeptideShaker. The BioTools developed by Compomics have inspired me a lot! Best wishes, |
Dear peptide-shaker team,
I receive this error when loading MSFragger result files :
Maybe due to the result file of the MSFragger-Labile Mode is different? Thanks
Best
Baopu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: