You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Duncan. This is Nelson from the mailing list. I'm going over the book and you talk about the "true atom" without giving a discussion on what an atom is. A search through the repo only talks about atoms in this section.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Okay, so I took a look at the text, and here's what I thought:
of course, you are right -- it's not cool to just drop something like that in there without explanation
SICP doesn't actually explain language syntax too much -- they tend to gloss over it
this seems like a reasonable thing to do, helping to limit scope for what is a rather extraordinary amount of work
it's also the sort of thing I imagine would be covered by TAs in a college course, or be required as part of prerequisite material
as such, I decided to drop the reference to atoms there as well as the footnote I'd inserted about true and false -- this was out of character from SICP
Hi Duncan. This is Nelson from the mailing list. I'm going over the book and you talk about the "true atom" without giving a discussion on what an atom is. A search through the repo only talks about atoms in this section.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: