Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Section 10.2.6 Conditional Expressions #2

Open
nelmil opened this issue Feb 15, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Section 10.2.6 Conditional Expressions #2

nelmil opened this issue Feb 15, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@nelmil
Copy link

nelmil commented Feb 15, 2015

Hi Duncan. This is Nelson from the mailing list. I'm going over the book and you talk about the "true atom" without giving a discussion on what an atom is. A search through the repo only talks about atoms in this section.

@oubiwann
Copy link
Contributor

Hey Nelson! Sorry, I only saw these tickets today -- I've just added myself to the watch list on this repo so I'll be getting them in the future, now.

Thanks for the time about atoms. I'll add some text (probably a thorough footnote) to point folks in the right direction.

@oubiwann
Copy link
Contributor

Okay, so I took a look at the text, and here's what I thought:

  • of course, you are right -- it's not cool to just drop something like that in there without explanation
  • SICP doesn't actually explain language syntax too much -- they tend to gloss over it
    • this seems like a reasonable thing to do, helping to limit scope for what is a rather extraordinary amount of work
    • it's also the sort of thing I imagine would be covered by TAs in a college course, or be required as part of prerequisite material
  • as such, I decided to drop the reference to atoms there as well as the footnote I'd inserted about true and false -- this was out of character from SICP

oubiwann added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 23, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants