Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quantify copy time from the processing pod to NFS Vs BUCKET #48

Open
subash-taranga opened this issue Aug 31, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Quantify copy time from the processing pod to NFS Vs BUCKET #48

subash-taranga opened this issue Aug 31, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@subash-taranga
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@subash-taranga
Copy link
Collaborator Author

subash-taranga commented Aug 31, 2024

image

Logs can be find here processed file copy to bucket logs.txt

image

image
image
image
image
image

image
image
image
subash@MSI:~/cloud-processing/standard-gke-cluster-gcs/argo$ argo logs @latest -n argo | grep 1342814727

image
image

image

image

image

image

image
image

image
image

image

image

We can see file copy starts as soon as Closed file take place and copy end with "sub-process exited"

subash@MSI:~/cloud-processing/standard-gke-cluster-nfs/argo$ argo logs pfnano-process-ww642 -n argo | grep 1995231051

**Can get full logs here
processed file copy to nfs logs 1.txt
processed file copy to nfs logs 2.txt
**

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

@tomcordruw
Copy link
Collaborator

@subash-taranga
I can confirm your observation from my end.
When testing a dataset processing 3 million events with both gcs bucket and nfs, output files were around 800MB in size and they took around 40 seconds to copy.

Testing a whole dataset, 29 million events, output files were ~2.0-2.5GB files and it took around 2 minutes.

@subash-taranga
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tomcordruw Yes it is correct....Thanks a lot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants