This style guide aims to provide the ground rules for CFPB's JavaScript code, such that it's highly readable and consistent across different developers on a team.
- Linting
- Modules
- Strict Mode
- Spacing
- Naming
- Semicolons
- Strings
- Variable Declaration
- Conditionals
- Equality
- Ternary Operators
- Functions
- Prototypes
- Object Literals
- Array Literals
- Regular Expressions
console
Statements- Comments
- Variable Naming
- Polyfills
- Everyday Tricks
- Credits
Lint your code using ESLint. CFPB-tailored ESLint options exist.
This style guide assumes you're using a module system such as CommonJS,
AMD, ES6 Modules, or any other kind of module system. If you are
using CommonJS, refer to the CommonJS guide
for structuring your modules. Modules systems provide individual scoping,
avoid leaks to the global
object, and improve code base organization by
automating dependency graph generation, instead of having to resort to
manually creating multiple <script>
tags.
Module systems also provide us with dependency injection patterns, which are crucial when it comes to testing individual components in isolation.
Always put 'use strict';
at the top of your global code (code that
is not exported), modules already use strict mode and thus don't require it.
Strict mode allows you to catch nonsensical behavior, discourages poor
practices, and is faster because it allows compilers to make certain
assumptions about your code.
Spacing must be consistent across every file in the application. To this end,
using something like .editorconfig
configuration files is highly
encouraged. Here are the defaults we suggest to get started with JavaScript
indentation.
# editorconfig.org
root = true
[*]
indent_style = space
indent_size = 2
end_of_line = lf
charset = utf-8
trim_trailing_whitespace = true
insert_final_newline = true
[*.md]
trim_trailing_whitespace = false
We always use 2 spaces for indentation in JavaScript files. The .editorconfig
file can take care of that for us and everyone would be able to create the
correct spacing by pressing the tab key.
Spacing doesn't just entail tabbing, but also the spaces before, after, and in between arguments of a function declaration. Try to keep this spacing consistent throughout the codebase.
Where possible, improve readability by keeping lines below the 80-character mark.
- Functions, variables, methods, objects and instances should be named using
camelCase
. - Constructors and prototypes should use
PascalCase
. - Symbolic constants should use
UPPERCASE
. - Encapsulated (private) variables and methods should use
_underscoreCamelCase
. Prefix variables or properties that reference a jQuery object withWe are currently phasing jQuery out of our codebases. If you are working on new code please use the common es5 and es6 features with polyfills to support older browsers if necessary.$
or_$
(depending on exposure). For example:var $button = $( '.btn-class' );
.
We advocate for using semicolons at the end of each line. This choice is done to avoid potential issues with Automatic Semicolon Insertion (ASI).
- Use single quotes (
'
) for inline strings without variables or conditions. - Use es6 template literals for inline strings with variables or conditions as well as multiline templates.
- Use double quotes (
"
) for attribute values within templates.
const name = "Jane";
const message = 'oh hai ' + name + "!";
const input = "<input value='" + message + "'" +
"type='text'" +
"class='a-text-input'>";
const name = 'Jane';
const message = `oh hai ${name}!`;
const input = `
<input value="${ message }"
type="text"
class="a-text-input">`;
Usually you'll be a happier JavaScript developer if you hack together a
parameter-replacing method like util.format
in Node. That way it'll be
far easier to format your strings, and the code looks a lot cleaner too.
Always declare variables in a consistent manner, and at the top of their scope, keeping variable declarations to single statements, including declarations that aren't assigned a value.
const foo = 1,
bar = 2;
let baz, pony;
let a
, b;
const foo = 1;
if ( foo > 1 ) {
const bar = 2;
}
(Because they're consistent with each other, not because of the style.)
const foo = 1;
const bar = 2;
let baz;
let pony;
let a;
let b;
const foo = 1;
let bar;
if ( foo > 1 ) {
bar = 2;
}
Brackets are enforced. This, together with a reasonable spacing strategy will help you avoid mistakes such as Apple's SSL/TLS bug.
if ( err ) throw err;
if ( err ) { throw err; }
It's even better if you avoid keeping conditionals on a single line, for the sake of text comprehension.
if ( err ) {
throw err;
}
Avoid using ==
and !=
operators, always favor ===
and !==
. These
operators are called the "strict equality operators," while their
counterparts will attempt to cast the operands into the same value type.
function isEmptyString( text ) {
return text == '';
}
isEmptyString( 0 );
// <- true
function isEmptyString( text ) {
return text === '';
}
isEmptyString( 0 );
// <- false
Ternary operators are fine for clear-cut conditionals, but unacceptable for confusing choices. As a rule, if you can't eye-parse it as fast as your brain can interpret the text that declares the ternary operator, chances are it's probably too complicated for its own good.
jQuery is a prime example of a codebase that's filled with nasty ternary operators.
function calculate( a, b ) {
return a && b ? 11 : a ? 10 : b ? 1 : 0;
}
function getName( mobile ) {
return mobile ? mobile.name : 'Generic Player';
}
In cases that may prove confusing just use if
and else
statements instead.
When declaring a function, always use the function declaration form instead of function expressions. Because hoisting.
const sum = ( x, y ) => {
return x + y;
};
// Note for clarity, the issue is not arrow functions, but the expression.
function sum( x, y ) {
return x + y;
}
That being said, there's nothing wrong with function expressions that are just currying another function.
const plusThree = sum.bind( null, 3 );
Keep in mind that function declarations will be hoisted to the top of the scope so it doesn't matter the order they are declared in. That being said, you should always keep functions at the top level in a scope, and avoid placing them inside conditional statements.
if ( Math.random() > 0.5 ) {
sum( 1, 3 );
function sum( x, y ) {
return x + y;
}
}
if ( Math.random() > 0.5 ) {
sum( 1, 3 );
}
function sum( x, y ) {
return x + y;
}
function sum( x, y ) {
return x + y;
}
if ( Math.random() > 0.5 ) {
sum( 1, 3 );
}
If you need a "no-op" method you can use either Function.prototype
, or
function noop () {}
. Ideally a single reference to noop
is used throughout
the application.
Whenever you have to manipulate an array-like object, cast it to an array.
const divs = document.querySelectorAll( 'div' );
for ( let i = 0; i < divs.length; i++ ) {
console.log( divs[i].innerHTML );
}
const divs = document.querySelectorAll( 'div' );
[].slice.call( divs ).forEach( div => {
console.log( div.innerHTML );
} );
However, be aware that there is a substantial performance hit in V8
environments when using this approach on arguments
. If performance is a
major concern, avoid casting arguments
with slice
and instead use a for
loop.
const args = [].slice.call( arguments );
let i;
const args = new Array( arguments.length );
for ( i = 0; i < args.length; i++ ) {
args[i] = arguments[i];
}
Don't declare functions inside of loops.
const values = [1, 2, 3];
let i;
for ( i = 0; i < values.length; i++ ) {
setTimeout( () => {
console.log( values[i] );
}, 1000 * i );
}
const values = [1, 2, 3];
let i;
for ( i = 0; i < values.length; i++ ) {
setTimeout( i => {
return () => {
console.log( values[i] );
};
}( i ), 1000 * i );
}
const values = [1, 2, 3];
let i;
for ( i = 0; i < values.length; i++ ) {
setTimeout( i => {
console.log( values[i] );
}, 1000 * i, i );
}
const values = [1, 2, 3];
let i;
for ( i = 0; i < values.length; i++ ) {
wait( i );
}
function wait( i ) {
setTimeout( () => {
console.log( values[i] );
}, 1000 * i );
}
Or even better, just use .forEach
which doesn't have the same caveats as
declaring functions in for
loops.
[1, 2, 3].forEach( function( value, i ) {
setTimeout( () => {
console.log( value );
}, 1000 * i );
} );
Whenever a method is non-trivial, make the effort to use a named function declaration rather than an anonymous function. This will make it easier to pinpoint the root cause of an exception when analyzing stack traces.
function once( fn ) {
let ran = false;
return () => {
if ( ran ) { return };
ran = true;
fn.apply( this, arguments );
};
}
function once( fn ) {
let ran = false;
return function run() {
if ( ran ) { return };
ran = true;
fn.apply( this, arguments );
};
}
Avoid keeping indentation levels from raising more than necessary by using
guard clauses instead of flowing if
statements.
if ( car ) {
if ( black ) {
if ( turbine ) {
return 'batman!';
}
}
}
if ( condition ) {
// 10+ lines of code
}
if ( !car ) {
return;
}
if ( !black ) {
return;
}
if ( !turbine ) {
return;
}
return 'batman!';
if ( !condition ) {
return;
}
// 10+ lines of code
Hacking native prototypes should be avoided at all costs, use a method instead. If you must extend the functionality in a native type, try using something like poser instead.
String.prototype.half = () => {
return this.substr( 0, this.length / 2 );
};
function half( text ) {
return text.substr( 0, text.length / 2 );
}
Avoid prototypical inheritance models unless you have a very good performance reason to justify yourself.
- Prototypical inheritance boosts puts need for
this
through the roof - It's way more verbose than using object literals
- It causes headaches when creating
new
objects - Needs a closure to hide valuable private state of instances
- Just use object literals instead
Instantiate using the egyptian notation {}
. Use factories instead of
constructors.
Instantiate using the square bracketed notation []
. If you have to declare a
fixed-dimension array for performance reasons then it's fine to use the
new Array( length )
notation instead.
Keep regular expressions in variables, don't use them inline. This will vastly improve readability.
if ( /\d+/.test( text ) ) {
console.log( 'so many numbers!' );
}
const numeric = /\d+/;
if ( numeric.test( text ) ) {
console.log( 'so many numbers!' );
}
Also learn how to write regular expressions, and what they actually do. Then you can also visualize them online.
Preferably bake console
statements into a service that can easily be
disabled in production. Alternatively, don't ship any console.log
printing
statements to production distributions.
Use JSDocs where applicable for JavaScript commenting.
Comments aren't meant to explain what the code does. Good code is supposed to be self-explanatory. If you're thinking of writing a comment to explain what a piece of code does, chances are you need to change the code itself. The exception to that rule is explaining what a regular expression does. Good comments are supposed to explain why code does something that may not seem to have a clear-cut purpose.
// Create the centered container.
const p = $( '<p/>' );
p.center( div );
p.text( 'foo' );
const container = $( '<p/>' );
const contents = 'foo';
container.center( parent );
container.text( contents );
megaphone.on( 'data', value => {
// The megaphone periodically emits updates for container.
container.text( value );
} );
// One or more digits somewhere in the string.
const numeric = /\d+/;
if ( numeric.test( text ) ) {
console.log( 'so many numbers!' );
}
Commenting out entire blocks of code should be avoided entirely, that's why you have version control systems in place!
Variables must have meaningful names so that you don't have to resort to commenting what a piece of functionality does. Instead, try to be expressive while succinct, and use meaningful variable names.
function a( x, y, z ) {
return z * y / x;
}
a( 4, 2, 6 );
// <- 3
function ruleOfThree( had, got, have ) {
return have * got / had;
}
ruleOfThree( 4, 2, 6 );
// <- 3
Where possible use the native browser implementation and include a polyfill that provides that behavior for unsupported browsers. This makes the code easier to work with and less involved in hackery to make things just work.
Although we continue to support IE8 and 9, we do not support scripted interactions and rely instead on progressive enhancement to provide IE8 and 9 users with a functioning experience.
If you can't patch a piece of functionality with a polyfill, then wrap all uses of the patching code in a globally available method that is accessible from everywhere in the application.
Use ||
to define a default value. If the left-hand value is falsy then
the right-hand value will be used. Be advised, that because of loose type
comparison, inputs like false
, 0
, null
or ''
will be evaluated as
falsy, and converted to default value. For strict type checking use
if (value === void 0) { value = defaultValue }
.
function a( value ) {
const defaultValue = 33;
const used = value || defaultValue;
}
Use .bind
to partially-apply functions.
function sum( a, b ) {
return a + b;
}
const addSeven = sum.bind( null, 7 );
addSeven( 6 );
// <- 13
Use Array.prototype.slice.call
to cast array-like objects to true arrays.
const args = Array.prototype.slice.call( arguments );
Use event emitters on all the things!
const emitter = contra.emitter();
body.addEventListener( 'click', () => {
emitter.emit('click', e.target );
} );
emitter.on( 'click', elem => {
console.log( elem );
} );
// simulate click
emitter.emit( 'click', document.body );
Use Function()
as a "no-op".
cb => {
setTimeout( cb || Function(), 2000 );
}
The original version of this document is based on Nicolas Bevacqua's functon qualityGuide, which is licensed under the MIT license.