-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 354
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build for Windows 10+ Universal #320
Comments
vs2022-17.2.6 in libdrv, usbip_stub, usbip_vhci, usbip_vhci_ude windows sdk version: $(LatestTargetPlatformVersion) Target OS Version: Windows 10 or higher Replace deprecated build every project separate, not build entire solution. at least it builds...
and i dont saw RtlZeroMemory after ExAllocatePoolWithTag in old code? only RtlCopyMemory sometimes. last time i try build with Spectre mitigation enabled , was some mess about missing or conflicting some system headers from wdk or sdk (but they was present somewhere in wdk/sdk folders). and installer have 3 different versions of spectre libs for toolset v143... that we should use? |
upd... i just instlled last spectre libs, and it builds with Spectre mitigation enabled. |
The example is just showing that the new
The docs for
So maybe |
I'll put in a PR for this. My biggest concern is breaking existing workflows. The READAME states that this project is not production ready. There are tags and releases in place. Presumably, anyone using this in production is using a tagged or released build. My plan is to:
This seems like a good idea, but I'm not familiar enough with the project to know if execution on the pool is necessary. If it is, we should fix that. |
upd: on win10 it bind device without errors , but device in manager shows with error =/ its google translated error from device manager:
__ ... but my build have some experimental changes... so not certain. __ despite the fact that the build from vs2019 works -_- |
and again upd... tried rebuild on (win10, vs2022...) !!! and i didnt replace ExAllocatePoolWithTag with ExAllocatePool2, and it works now O_o? |
just checked... it works. we also may need consider this... |
This isn't surprising.....
The official docs state thsi too. As you've stated, not everything zeros memory. I don't think we're missing much by not doing something that never happened. Can we consider a test matrix for this project? There are no contribution guidelines and I don't know when I should consider a PR ready for review. |
This fails to build out of the box with the following configuration:
For this, we need:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: