Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Adjust optimization passes for parameterized circuits #168

Open
pehamTom opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

✨ Adjust optimization passes for parameterized circuits #168

pehamTom opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
c++ Anything related to C++ code feature New feature or request

Comments

@pehamTom
Copy link
Member

What's the problem this feature will solve?

At the moment, some preprocessing optimization passes fail when dealing with QuantumComputations involving SymbolicOperations. Many (if not all) of the optimization passes do not require the circuit to consist entirely of non-symbolic operations (like SWAP reconstruction).

Describe the solution you'd like

When checking parameterized circuits for equivalence, optimization passes should be transparently applied just like with non-parameterized circuits. This requires minor adjustments in the respective optimization passes.

@burgholzer
Copy link
Member

Just for reference: cda-tum/mqt-core#205 tracks the corresponding feature in the QFR where the optimization passes reside.

@burgholzer burgholzer mentioned this issue Oct 19, 2022
4 tasks
@burgholzer burgholzer removed their assignment Oct 21, 2022
@burgholzer burgholzer added feature New feature or request c++ Anything related to C++ code labels Oct 21, 2022
MarlQ pushed a commit to MarlQ/qcec that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Anything related to C++ code feature New feature or request
Projects
Status: No status
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants