Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

merge from immerda #6

Open
wants to merge 34 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

riseuplabs
Copy link

Hi,

I was looking around for the best puppet virtual module, and I found yours, but I also found that the immerda group had made a number of recent improvements that were not contained within your repository (git://git.puppet.immerda.ch/module-virt.git).

Their changes were on top of your unstable branch, which has not seen commits from you since 2010. You have been making other commits in the master branch that were useful. So what this meant was that you had new things in master, and immerda had new things in unstable. Time for a merge!

I've done that merge, and resolved the conflicts and I present to you this pull request to consider. The biggest difference here is the class refactoring that immerda did which brings your module in-line with best practices for module auto-loading. It places different classes into files, rather them being all in init.pp and params.pp. This is a really good improvement, but hard to wrap your head around when it comes to merging.

Anyways, have a look, it would be good to get these sync'd up as I think both of you have been doing good work. Let me know if you have any questions.

carlasouza and others added 30 commits October 20, 2010 11:10
* split things up between technologies and then between operating-
  systems
* include legacy stuff from the virtual module
* refactor things
* add various scripts and facts
duritong and others added 4 commits June 5, 2012 18:45
Conflicts:
	examples/virt-example.pp
	lib/puppet/provider/virt/libvirt.rb
	lib/puppet/type/virt.rb
	manifests/init.pp
@blkperl
Copy link
Contributor

blkperl commented Jul 4, 2012

@carlasouza Are you planning to merge this? I want to do some refactoring and I don't want to be rebasing against this. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants