You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Maybe not necessarily the right place for it, but can't hurt to ask...
Francesca Loi clued me into CrystalBall as a way around a problem I'm having with WSclean. I'm trying to continue a previous WSclean run that I'm performing at high spectral resolution (i.e. using a large value of -channels-out) to better model the PSF over the bandwidth and mitigate the classic ring-like structures you see when you're not fully exploiting having a massive fractional bandwidth.
I've managed to get CrystalBall to successfully predict the source list into the MODEL_DATA column, so you'd think I'd be all set up to continue deconvolution, but no... WSclean is still trying to predict the model (which has some NaN/infs because of flagged channel ranges) which is exactly what I was trying to avoid in the first place... I can't be the only one who's come across this, so I thought I'd ask here if anyone can check my inputs. Maybe there's something I'm missing, but what I'm trying to run is:
@IanHeywood is correct, the option you should be using is -subtract-model not -continue see below documentation from WSClean
-subtract-model
Subtract the model from the data column in the first iteration. This can be used to reimage
an already cleaned image, e.g. at a different resolution.
Hi folks.
Maybe not necessarily the right place for it, but can't hurt to ask...
Francesca Loi clued me into
CrystalBall
as a way around a problem I'm having withWSclean
. I'm trying to continue a previousWSclean
run that I'm performing at high spectral resolution (i.e. using a large value of-channels-out
) to better model the PSF over the bandwidth and mitigate the classic ring-like structures you see when you're not fully exploiting having a massive fractional bandwidth.I've managed to get
CrystalBall
to successfully predict the source list into theMODEL_DATA
column, so you'd think I'd be all set up to continue deconvolution, but no...WSclean
is still trying to predict the model (which has some NaN/infs because of flagged channel ranges) which is exactly what I was trying to avoid in the first place... I can't be the only one who's come across this, so I thought I'd ask here if anyone can check my inputs. Maybe there's something I'm missing, but what I'm trying to run is:I've found that I get the same issue regardless of whether I include the
-reuse-psf
and-reuse-dirty
options so I'm a bit stumped 🤷The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: