Relicensing
#302
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
|
The compiler itself is intended to be LGPL, while I intend to make the standard library MIT. This is because I don't want some company to fork the compiler and then not contribute back to the main compiler. But I also want to make the standard library totally easy to replace and amend for commercial platforms. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
|
And the reason why the compiler is LGPL is because there's been a bit of malicious forks of other compilers that I wish to avoid. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is it possible?
E.g. to Apache or MIT (or dual). I think it will increase the popularity of the nice project.
I noticed that you have changed the licence from BSD-2 to LGPL.
Just wondering: why?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions