You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It might be interesting to have a binary tree to hold arbitrary (possibly typed) binary data in the parse tree. This could also be represented as a very large integer, which could use the base-16 or base-64 notation.
Example:
some_data is bits 16#FFFF_FFFE_FFFD_FFFC_FFFB__FFFA_FFF9_FFF8_FFF7_FFF6_FFF5_FFF4_FFF3_FFF2_FFF1_FFF0
Currently, the above does not work because the integer value is too big. There is probably a need for specific prefixes (e.g. bits above), which could also serve as an elementary type for the value.
It might be interesting to have a binary tree to hold arbitrary (possibly typed) binary data in the parse tree. This could also be represented as a very large integer, which could use the base-16 or base-64 notation.
Example:
Currently, the above does not work because the integer value is too big. There is probably a need for specific prefixes (e.g.
bits
above), which could also serve as an elementary type for the value.This could be implemented through issue #27.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: