Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The adapt accuracies are not comparable to no adapt? #1

Open
Originofamonia opened this issue Feb 19, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

The adapt accuracies are not comparable to no adapt? #1

Originofamonia opened this issue Feb 19, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@Originofamonia
Copy link

Originofamonia commented Feb 19, 2021

Hi,

Thanks for your code. It helps a lot. When I was trying to reproduce your results on the amazon review datasets, I found the BERT-ADD accuracies are worse than no adapt results? Have you encountered the same issue? Epoch [79/80] Step [195/200]: acc=0.5000 g_loss=0.6922 d_loss=0.6932 kd_loss=0.0000. I also noticed that when the adapt training converges, only the kd_loss descent to 0, but g_loss and d_loss didn't descend at all. Is it normal or maybe this is where the problem is? Or could you please release the hyperparameters for Bert-AAD?

Thanks,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant