Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Refactor Redis operations error handling into a utility function #349

Open
coderabbitai bot opened this issue Jun 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Refactor Redis operations error handling into a utility function #349

coderabbitai bot opened this issue Jun 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@sporkmonger
Labels
area/plugin-api Categorizes the issue or PR as relating to the plugin API or SDK. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. rust Pull requests that update Rust code
Milestone
Release 0.7.0

Comments

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 19, 2024 •
edited by sporkmonger
Loading

In the context of PR #348, it was suggested to refactor the repetitive error handling and permission checks in Redis operations into a utility function to improve code maintainability. See the discussion here: #348 (comment)
@sporkmonger sporkmonger added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. rust Pull requests that update Rust code area/plugin-api Categorizes the issue or PR as relating to the plugin API or SDK. labels Jun 19, 2024
@sporkmonger sporkmonger added this to the Release 0.7.0 milestone Jun 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sporkmonger sporkmonger

Labels
area/plugin-api Categorizes the issue or PR as relating to the plugin API or SDK. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. rust Pull requests that update Rust code
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Release 0.7.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@sporkmonger