Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ec: Use 3 fewer squarings for P-256 scalar inversion. #2154

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

briansmith
Copy link
Owner

Back in 2021 a GitHub user "Nik-U" showed a better addition chain for P-256 scalar inversion. This addition chain is slightly better than that one.

@briansmith briansmith self-assigned this Oct 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.97%. Comparing base (f291606) to head (33fd099).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2154      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.97%   96.97%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         151      151              
  Lines       19544    19575      +31     
  Branches      467      467              
==========================================
+ Hits        18952    18982      +30     
  Misses        487      487              
- Partials      105      106       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Back in 2021 a GitHub user "Nik-U" showed a better addition chain for
P-256 scalar inversion. This addition chain is slightly better than
that one.
@briansmith briansmith changed the title p256: Use 3 less additions in addition chain for scalar inversion. ec: Use 3 fewer squarings for P-256 scalar inversion. Oct 14, 2024
@briansmith briansmith merged commit befdc87 into main Oct 14, 2024
158 checks passed
@briansmith briansmith deleted the b/p256-inversion-chain branch October 14, 2024 20:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant