From 20da46da56d9347e6fdb584a3035e39c0692e5e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Barry Revzin <barry.revzin@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:27:21 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Ugh typo

---
 2996_reflection/p2996r8.html  | 8 ++++----
 2996_reflection/reflection.md | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/2996_reflection/p2996r8.html b/2996_reflection/p2996r8.html
index 7a62f008..63192f51 100644
--- a/2996_reflection/p2996r8.html
+++ b/2996_reflection/p2996r8.html
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
   <meta charset="utf-8" />
   <meta name="generator" content="mpark/wg21" />
   <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes" />
-  <meta name="dcterms.date" content="2024-10-29" />
+  <meta name="dcterms.date" content="2024-11-03" />
   <title>Reflection for C++26</title>
   <style>
       code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ <h1 class="title" style="text-align:center">Reflection for C++26</h1>
   </tr>
   <tr>
     <td>Date:</td>
-    <td>2024-10-29</td>
+    <td>2024-11-03</td>
   </tr>
   <tr>
     <td style="vertical-align:top">Project:</td>
@@ -4906,8 +4906,8 @@ <h3 data-number="4.4.22" id="other-type-traits"><span class="header-section-numb
 opposed to a function type), and the second would simply answer
 <code class="sourceCode cpp"><span class="kw">false</span></code> for
 the reflection of <em>any</em> type (function type or otherwise).</p>
-<p>Moreover, in this case it’s actually import than the reflection query
-<code class="sourceCode cpp">std<span class="op">::</span>meta<span class="op">::</span>is_function</code>
+<p>Moreover, in this case it’s actually important that the reflection
+query <code class="sourceCode cpp">std<span class="op">::</span>meta<span class="op">::</span>is_function</code>
 does <em>not</em> return
 <code class="sourceCode cpp"><span class="kw">true</span></code> for a
 function type so that using
diff --git a/2996_reflection/reflection.md b/2996_reflection/reflection.md
index ba3fe408..c5772c08 100644
--- a/2996_reflection/reflection.md
+++ b/2996_reflection/reflection.md
@@ -3037,7 +3037,7 @@ But this is no longer the case. Consider the name `is_function`. It could be:
 
 Both of these are useful, yet they mean different things entirely - the first is ill-formed when passed a reflection of a function (as opposed to a function type), and the second would simply answer `false` for the reflection of _any_ type (function type or otherwise).
 
-Moreover, in this case it's actually import than the reflection query `std::meta::is_function` does _not_ return `true` for a function type so that using `is_function` as a filter for `members_of` does the expected thing — only giving you back functions, rather than also types.
+Moreover, in this case it's actually important that the reflection query `std::meta::is_function` does _not_ return `true` for a function type so that using `is_function` as a filter for `members_of` does the expected thing — only giving you back functions, rather than also types.
 
 A similar kind of clash could occur with other functions — for instance, we don't have an `is_array(r)` right now that would check if `r` were the reflection of an array (as opposed to an array type), but we could in the future.